This interesting letter showed up in my inbox last week. Truth is, many people have been aware of this for some time and just weren't sure when and where to unveil it. The cat had to jump out of the bag, publicly, at some point after somebody has been trampled badly and/or has had enough of legal and judicial abuse. The questions have always been . . . Should someone petition the current Supreme Court with Mandamus or serve a Quo Warranto on the Prosecuting Attorney(Thurston Insider Ed Holm)? But, we already know from past experience and petitions that the Washington Supreme Court say "they don't do Mandamus anymore" despite it being clearly defined in Wa State Law. -and- Do you think Mr. Ed is going to stand up for the constitution and against the Thurston Insider network? Doubtful, at best.Conclusions:
1. Thurston Judicial Offices were vacant for at least eight years.
2. Thurston Commissioner's likely didn't or don't have one either.
3. All decisions by these judges should be considered nullified during at least an eight year period.
4. Explains why these Hazard County judges aren't too concerned about following the Constitution.
5. They've likely covered their tracks and have back dated oaths on hand now that were just probably "misfiled" at the Sec. of State's office. Oh, BTW, the State office where Thurston Insider Sam Reed recently appointed Nick Handy (Thurston Judge Paula Casey's Husband as our Sate Director of Elections) Good luck getting a fair vote count in November (ala Dino Rossi v. Gregoire).
6. They will hunt me down like a dog and make me pay for standing up to "dem bullies."
7. Who cares, right? Just shut up, drink your Kool Aid, party, jet ski, fornicate and have a good time. Life is short, who cares? Let's just pretend we are free and we live under the rule of law and are protected by the Washington and US Constitutions.
8. A new state "law" will be written amending the constitution stating judges don't need to take a Pesky Oath to actually follow the highest, great law of the land. Nah, that would just get in the way of doing things the Hazard County way.
Notes:
RCW 2.08.080
| Oath of Office | |
Every judge of a superior court shall, before entering upon the duties of his office, take and subscribe an oath that he will support the Constitution of the United States and the Constitution of the state of Washington, and will faithfully and impartially discharge the duties of judge to the best of his ability, which oath shall be filed in the office of the secretary of state. Such oath or affirmation to be in form substantially the same as prescribed for justices of the supreme court.
[1971 c 81 § 5; 1890 p 344 § 15; RRS § 11051.]
Causes of Vacancy
Every elective office shall become vacant on the happening of any of the following events:
(6) His or her refusal or neglect to take his or her oath of office, or to give or renew his or her official bond, or to deposit such oath or bond within the time prescribed by law;
2 comments:
Now you just got to take said "judges" personally to court (include their spouses as defendents) for acting under "colour of law".
You wouldn't be suing the offices but the individuals.
Keep up this great work!
This issue has been argued in Thurston and Pierce going back 20 years. Aside from the "raising cane" effect, I think it goes no where. And no, I don't condone it. It merely shows that arrogance has been deeply ingrained in Washington State. i.e. they don't give ashit!
Post a Comment